Normally, to compare the cost of rifle powder, we take the cost of the powder, divided by the number of rounds we can get from it, and say Powder Type X1 costs Y1 per round, compared to Type X2 costing Y2 per round.

And that is a valid comparison when there is batch consistency.

When there is no batch consistency, it is necessary to verify the load each time the batch number changes, for safety if nothing else.

Verifying a load costs money. It involves one trip to the range to chrony the new powder batch, to determine the variation to the old batch.

Let's say a miracle has happened, and the new Somchem batch is not materially different from the old batch. You're down for the cost of a range trip, some bullets and primers, which have to be added to the cost of the powder, because that's what it cost you to use that powder.

If it's not your day for a miracle, there will be a difference. Do you want to correct it ? If not, no additional cost for you.

If you have to correct it, you're in for a bit of load development, Another cost to you, to add to the cost of the powder.

You need to test your load development. Another trip to the range, another cost.

Tested ok ? Great. Does the scope need to be re-zeroed ? More ammo to put together, and another trip to the range to zero.

Not bothered by driving up and down over the course of a few days doing quality control ? Then you are a loyal Somchem customer.

Add up all the costs of the bullets and primers for this exercise, the several range fees, the cost of driving there and back several times, and add that to the powder cost. That is what it costs to use Somchem powder.

Consider Vihatavuori. Higher price compared to Somchem ? Very. Double the price. Quality control ? Flawless. Batch consistency ? Immaculate.

Is it more expensive to use than Somchem ? No. Obviously not. Just do the math. No load redevelopment. No extra cost, just the price on the tin.

It should be a no-brainer.